Law

    🔗 Some legal malpractice cases are bogus, and many are defensible. But some are, well, not, which is apparently how State Bar Court Judge Yvette D. Roland in California viewed the misconduct proceedings against John Eastman, the now-disbarred architect of the 2020 fake electors nonsense. (PDF)

    Chris Geidner at Law Dork has the best explanation of why the 5th Circuit’s jurisprudence has become so, to use a legal term of art, whacky:

    At the end of the day, there are essentially three groups of active judges on the Fifth Circuit: There are “mad vibes” judges, legally conservative judges, and legally moderate (or more left) judges.

    Geidner is so insightful and prolific that, and I mean this as a high compliment, it irritates me a little.

    A quote screenshot from an article by Chris Geidner in his Law Dork newsletter, which says:&10;&10;At the end of the day, there are essentially three groups of active judges on the Fifth Circuit: There are “mad vibes” judges, legally conservative judges, and legally moderate (or more left) judges.

    Dear Lawyers Still Manually Numbering Paragraphs:

    Stop it.

    Here’s a tutorial:

    1. Place your cursor where you intend to begin the numbered section of your pleading.
    2. Click the numbered list button in your word processor.
    3. Repent, and feel your soul become lighter.

    Yours, scoldingly,

    Joe

    ⚖️ From a report at Law Dork by its proprietor, Chris Geidner:

    Starr issued an “administrative stay” on Thursday that will last for 30 days while he considers the airline’s request for a stay of the order pending its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

    Judge Starr is having a good think about whether he’s willing to endure the near-certain reversal, and the more-likely-than-not searing bench slap that will accompany it…